Re: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us



Uploaded by: CoryTheRaven
Video Description:
Web 2.0 will force us to rethink everything through publishing more of the written word?




Tags for this video: anthropology digital ethnography hypermedia ksudigg web2.0

Find more videos in the "Howto" category
See more videos uploaded by CoryTheRaven

Related Videos
Information R/evolutionProfessor Walsh explaining "The machine is us"Web 2.0 is here
information-revolution.htmlinformation-revolution.htmlinformation-revolution.html
Power of Web 2.0Health 2.0 Version 2 response to The Machine is Us/ing Us5000 Web Apps in 333 Seconds at SimpleSpark.com
information-revolution.htmlinformation-revolution.htmlinformation-revolution.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
i dont so much see ... ( 1 year ago by hovering1)
i dont so much see that as rethinking anything, i see it as your having just done all the corporate medias work for them (how easy is it for them to advertise AT you all the time when they know where you go and for what), and youre being desensitized, being prepared for a day when all your movements will have to be government pre-approved via web 2.0 by cataloging your entire day, logging into websites to set things up, even reporting it to the authorities if you wander off course..
there are alot of ... ( 1 year ago by akseakayaker)
there are alot of great video's here, but I think this one is brilliant.
I don't see the ... ( 1 year ago by CoryTheRaven)
I don't see the rethinking... I consult the computer rather than the TV, paper maps and schedules, and the telephone. Accessing all this online is more efficient, but it's not a paradigm shift.
Cuddling with my ... ( 1 year ago by CoryTheRaven)
Cuddling with my girlfriend on the couch with the cats, in front of the fire, eating peppermint ice cream and listening to her talk is ANYTHING but a passive reception of information. Having spent the last few months away from her at school, I guarantee you even more now than I did in the video that MSN isn't even in the same ballpark.
I kinda got most of ... ( 1 year ago by guthixworshiper)
I kinda got most of it. I'm only a youngen in my teens, and i got most of it, but i didn't get the whole picture of it. Is is that your saying the internet is changing lives much because we still read books and watch TV or Movies? Help. Please.
He is saying that ... ( 1 year ago by Dylnuge)
He is saying that the internet is only simulating reality. In other words, the fact that we can now all edit the internet and upload content (well, with a computer, connection, and information, at least) does not change the fact that it is virtual. We are not communicating in a physical sense, it just feels like it. The standard nuances of communication are missing. Regardless of speed and content, the internet is not reality.
i think im missing ... ( 1 year ago by pimpinpan)
i think im missing the whole huge web 2.0 debate here as well... the way i see it, the internet isn't reality, *duh*. end of story. so i really dont understand where the disagreement comes from... like to me everyones saying more or less the same thing? i dont get it...
Hi, We had woops ... ( 1 year ago by mrhope30)
Hi, We had woops for the press and all the forms of communication that followed. What scares me is what we are really trying to unconsciously create. You mentioned the ultimate goal, Virtual Reality. Everything that has been designed, has been designed to enable us NOT to have the need to touch. This coupled with the rise of more deadly bacteria will leave us with only one option. For us to survive we can not touch. V.R. will be our only true ecsape from the threat of extinction by disease.
Brilliant! All ... ( 11 months ago by 808jgirl)
Brilliant! All this virtual communication is merely training wheels until we have the skills that enable us with the courage to face each other in the flesh. It's a start, and Thank God for that! Yeee Hooooo!
WOW lot's of great ... ( 10 months ago by ifxman)
WOW lot's of great comments.
I really enjoy reading your thoughts. Isn't this what we're really talking about? :) COMMUNICATION There are so many variables to the formula that we have to slap a 2.0 on it to comprehend the vastness of bringing all these things together in one place...not to mention the human factor. That's
the one were we all have different experiences viewing the exact same subject matter... See why I'm so messed up? whew... 5 Star Video Subscription
(cont'd) not ... ( 10 months ago by panda1pandemic)
(cont'd) not because it replaces those forms, but because it is more useful-- my written words have never had the power to reach as broad or large an audience as they do right now. Not only that, I can write all this, and carry a conversation with a friend on AIM at the same time. Consider students-- Typical college students spend as much as half of their relational experience each year through an impersonal medium. If this trend continues, shouldn't we evaluate how we identify ourselves?
I really hate to ... ( 10 months ago by panda1pandemic)
I really hate to say this, but I think I'm missing the point. I agree that Web 2.0 is nothing more than a re-organizing of written word and motion picture media (ok, recorded sound too), and that they can never replace other, more conventional forms. If Wesch's argument is that a paradigm shift is happening in identity and community construction because it is making those forms of media obsolete, I would say he is wrong... but I think such a paradigm shift is happening all the same... (cont'd)
Okay... how does it ... ( 10 months ago by CoryTheRaven)
Okay... how does it change how we identify ourselves?
I can't answer that ... ( 10 months ago by panda1pandemic)
I can't answer that. But to start, substituting half of someone's personal experiences for impersonal ones is bound to be depressing and lonely, right? That definitely affects their identity construction.
interesting, but a ... ( 10 months ago by gene11111)
interesting, but a couple of thoughts. I see Cory's counter point to Wesch, not much has changed (aren't we conversing in text?) But Wesch, to me, is about organization - and there in lies the paradigm change. and to Cory's point about interaction: Wii we're only scratching the surface
It's all about the ... ( 9 months ago by bbc789789)
It's all about the bandwidth. If we can make more of it and sprinkle it everywhere, all sorts of really cool virtual reality stuff will happen.
If you think that you waste lots of time on the internet NOW, just wait until Web 2.0 -- we are all in for a major lifestyle change. No more time for TV or sleeping; just internet all day every day until it PERMANENTLY crashes your computer. Web 3.0 will be the backlash--just wait until you see T
HAT one!! (I got a sneek peek and it is amazing)
good.. ( 8 months ago by bizzbuzz2u)
good..
boring... learn to ... ( 3 months ago by TMThenu)
boring... learn to present your idea better. Not worth as a reply to the original.
it's not about the ... ( 2 months ago by xpxzampop)
it's not about the content, it's about the medium. and that was really really boring.
So boring in fact, ... ( 2 months ago by saddiction)
So boring in fact, that it generated pages upon pages of comments. Most of which are positive in nature.
Yep, really boring. ... ( 2 months ago by saddiction)
Yep, really boring. Where's the boobs?!? Geez, the poster could have AT LEAST included some poor soul getting kicked in the pills, or some idiot eating a dozen habaneros and washing it down with a gallon of hot sauce!
Perhaps you could present a reply exhibiting what YOU think is a better idea in response to the original?
good point. that ... ( 2 months ago by xpxzampop)
good point. that means one of two things: a) I am personally just more susceptible to boredom or b) Watching a guy write on pages for 3 minutes is not boring which one do you think it is?
I think this is the ... ( 2 months ago by twoevileyes)
I think this is the perfect answer for the original video and people did not get the presenter's idea. Why? Simply because he is *writing* (words, of course) with pen and paper and could perfectly show his point of view. After all, what is the original but only a bunch of words?
nope. you are right ... ( 2 months ago by xpxzampop)
nope. you are right and I am wrong.


خلفيات وصور عالية الدقة,مكتبة ضخمة,2MrNa Photoslibrary for I


Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code