Dr Wolff Philosophy Physics Video: Wave Structure of Matter

Search Tags:

Categories:

Dr Wolff Philosophy Physics Video: Wave Structure of Matter

Uploaded by: physics1philosophy
Video Description:
Digital video interview on truth and reality - Philosophy Physics Metaphysics of Space and the Wave Structure of Matter. All Matter interactions are wave interactions in space (not particle / field interactions in space-time). The most simple science language for describing reality clearly works, please don't ignore it! The Wave Structure of Matter is sensible, logical, obvious once known. Please help make this knowledge visible on the internet. Thanks, Geoff Haselhurst
http://www.spaceandmotion.com http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Most-Simple-Scientific-Theory-Reality.htm http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Albert-Einstein-Theory-Relativity.htm http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Quantum-Theory-Mechanics.htm http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Cosmology.htm http://ww
w.spaceandmotion.com/Philosophy.htm Note (May, 2008) Milo Wolff has just published his latest book. "Schrodinger's Universe and the Origin of the Natural Laws" http://www.amazon.com/Schroedingers-Universe-Origin-Natural-Laws/dp/1432719793/

Tags for this video: GUT matter metaphysics philosophy physics reality science theory TOE truth wave

Find more videos in the "Education" category
See more videos uploaded by physics1philosophy

Related Videos

Amazing Facts of Quantum Physics	The Elegant Universe - Einstein's Relativity	Grand Unified Field Theory: Nassim Haramein Pt.1

Philosophy: Closeup on Existentialism	Immortal Technique -- The Poverty of Philosophy	Quantum Mechanics for Dummies - Electrons Are Weird

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Ho my god ... I've ... ( 5 months ago by sicjd)

Ho my god ... I've never seen that much crap !
He completely missed the problem between special relativity and quantum theory ... not to mention quantum field theory already solve this problem. That guy is completely retarted !
The problem with modern theoretical physics is unifying general relativity with quantum gravity, and beleive me you can't do that with some simple algebra ...

I beleive someone ... ( 5 months ago by jukebob)

I beleive someone here may possibly be a retart

Well Jukebob - be ... ( 5 months ago by BRAIDERMAN)

Well Jukebob - be careful. It might be you! Because in the space of 9 words you have made 2 spelling mistakes!

Matter and energy ... ( 5 months ago by renegaderhombus1)

Matter and energy don't exist

Hey Jukebob, after ... ( 5 months ago by sicjd)

Hey Jukebob, after viewing your page I saw that you're a big fan of this pseudo science bullshit, so you think I'm the one who is retarted ? Well let me ask you something, when was the last time you opened a REAL physics book ? Not some pop science book or metaphysics book, a real mathematical physics book ? Well guess what, this is what I do for a living ! I know what I'm talking about, I know how to recognize bullshit when I see it ... beleive me, this is absolute crap !

You mean they ... ( 5 months ago by hollowquark)

You mean they actually pay you?!! Are you sure it's not just to check for spelling errors?

Yes buddy I'm sure, ... ( 5 months ago by sicjd)

Yes buddy I'm sure, the gouvernment is responsible for most of my paycheck, we call that reasearch grant ;)

Wow ... Am I ... ( 3 months ago by bobjazz11)

Wow ... Am I expected to believe that you didn't spot that I borrowed the spellings of those two words in question from the posting immediately above mine (to which I was ironically replying) - what a bunch of shitheads!! from whom I (ironically) borrowed the spellings in question;

As you're the one ... ( 3 months ago by bobjazz11)

As you're the one that posted retard with a 't' and 'believe as 'beleive' - perhaps I was expecting too much in expecting you to appreciate my (surely obvious) ironic comment. I have no way of knowing from either your channel or your postings what you do; but I can say that I don't see anything here on YouTube that would lead me to believe your claim to be involved in Physics You are though, clearly, mildly dyslexic - a much more agreeable term than 'retart' don't you think?

I was replying to ' ... ( 3 months ago by BRAIDERMAN)

I was replying to 'Jukebob' not to you 'bobjazz11', unless you are co-habitating the aether with aliases.

I am the same ... ( 3 months ago by bobblues1)

I am the same person (look here's another one) - I post to sites the 'prefixes' of which are all 'bob' with the 'suffixes' reflecting the content. By the way, I love your spelling of 'gouvernment'; - and could you tell us(as you claim to read books on 'real physics') what the 'aether' is that you have referred to.. Could I suggest you try a 'pop science book' on Einstein if you're not sure?

Hi 'bobblues1' - No ... ( 3 months ago by BRAIDERMAN)

Hi 'bobblues1' - No it wasn't me who mis-spelled the word 'government' - must be someone else. As to the 'aether', I wasn't using that word in terms of the 'hypothetical luminiferous aether' - merely just an aside as to the world of the internet. Have a Good Day Bobblues1 - be 'bobhappygolucky' next time. Chow.

Sorry that was ... ( 3 months ago by bobblues1)

Sorry that was sicjd ... Have you noticed that very few of the postings dealing with this clip are 'scientific'- but in fact appeal to some real; imagined; or virtual 'Authority' ... Aristotle will be turning in his grave. Have a Good Day yourself Braiderman BobWhatever

It is funny to hear ... ( 3 months ago by sassafrassquach)

It is funny to hear you say that ANYTHING is BS - even Einstein was humble enough to admit that he didn't even know all of the 'basics'... he also raised simplicity to the highest order... and YOUR science, that you hold so dear is so damned complex that most scientists cant grasp it either. I dare you to even claim that you understand it. I dare you to describe REAL physics....

If you find a ... ( 3 months ago by Saskachewan)

If you find a little about quarks you discover for your surprise that scientists have really NEVER caught them. They're only theoretical entities, like photons. AFAIK the only "proof" for quarks is the scattering on neutrons which showed three scattering centers, but it could be explained by the shape of the neutron's standing wave, same as for electron's standing wave patterns which usually have many "lobes" but strangely noone suggests that they consists from some quarks ;J

What do you want to ... ( 3 months ago by Saskachewan)

What do you want to know?

What do you do in ... ( 3 months ago by sicjd)

What do you do in life ? Please tell me, I'm sure I can do it better than you !
This is presicely what you are telling me, that you can perhaps understand physics better than I do, but this is my job !
Most scientist I know understand perfectly science, at least it's current state. Does that mean they know everything ? No, but they know enough to tell that Wolff Philosophy is a phony ; he has no credibility at all in the scientific community. Read real scientific journals,not youtube.

I am very ... ( 3 months ago by zezt)

I am very interested in this but am relly new to it. So i ask this question: how does what this means effect this here MACRO world?...what are/will be consequences?

Hi Z, Very good ... ( 3 months ago by physics1philosophy)

Hi Z, Very good question - what it is really all about. What we are as humans existing in the universe, how does this affect our life. The short answer. 1. WSM provides a foundation for deducing the truth about things, to allow us to act wisely (the opposite of current humanity). 2. It tells us that matter and space are one thing (there are no discrete particles as Einstein realised). We humans are extended in space, the body is an illusion. This will change how we treat our world. Cont....

I am convinced this ... ( 3 months ago by physics1philosophy)

I am convinced this knowledge is critical to our future survival. We certainly would not destroy nature and pollute our environment, as they are a part of us. WSM also tells us that evolution and ecology are very important, as they relate directly to the fundamental aspect of reality, it is a dynamic unity, all things are interconnected and changing (due to spherically vibrating space - the spherical in
out waves provide continual 2 way communication between wave center 'particles'). more...

Thanks. I would ... ( 3 months ago by zezt)

Thanks. I would prefer though if you said the body was BOTH not-real and real. For reasons that--my interest has been mythology, and I find that many of the myths denigrate Nature. Focussing on Eastern Idealism which states reality is 'illusion' Maya, negative consequences have come for that concept

Please watch this ' ... ( 3 months ago by zezt)

Please watch this 'Jeremy Narby -Biospheric TV' where he is trying to explore what consciousness is /watch?v=gEKjAmEHDa0 Do you gell with this? Can you add something from your perspective to what he is exploring here?

Wolff isn't saying ... ( 2 months ago by Fushapan)

Wolff isn't saying he knows everything, and name-calling (he's a phony) is an invalid argument-form. I understand your worry about crackpots (new age folks being the typical crowd for that). But having such a hostile view to different ideas is not productive. Sorry

Well said! ( 2 months ago by physics1philosophy)

Well said!

Tell a friend:

2MrNa.cOm Videos

Run your own youtube sharing site

Dr Wolff Philosophy Physics Video: Wave Structure of Matter

URL
Embed Code