Michael Jordan 1997: First Game Vs. Shaq/Kobe Lakers, 30pts



Uploaded by: hoopsencyclopedia
Video Description:
If I remember correctly, I believe MJ had one of his all-night-golf outings before this game which was one reason why his shot might have eluded him this night. This game was interesting in that MJ was meeting Shaq in LA for the first time. On a side note, the appetizer was a very young and skinny Kobe Bryant who was given 10 minutes in his first ever game against his idol. And as MJ greeted a rookie Shaq in Orlando in their first meeting with a block, MJ welcomed the future star to a modest dunk in their very first matchup (the 2nd meeting is also uploaded on my channel).
But the story of the game was the game. The Bulls were taken aback by an amazing night from Van Exel and Shaq and fell behind by 22 at the half. MJ's shot was only visible at the end of the half which was probably why the Bulls didn't drop by 30. In the 2nd half, MJ became what he would call "Th
e Utility Man". He plugged all the holes and did the dirty work - hustling on defense, setting screens, passing to the hot man etc. Down 18 points in the 4th, Kukoc and Pip stepped up and stood besides MJ's leadership and brought the game to OT. And while MJ's shot was still MIA, he drilled the nail
-in-coffin free throws to seal the game. This was one of the most amazing comebacks ever and one reason why the Bulls were the Bulls.




Tags for this video: AI Basketball Bird Bulls Carmelo Chicago Garnett Heat Iverson Jordan Kobe Lakers Lebron Magic Michael Paul Shaq Wade Yao

Find more videos in the "Sports" category
See more videos uploaded by hoopsencyclopedia

Related Videos
Michael Jordan 2002: NBA Record 51 pts at age 38Michael Jordan 1993 Playoffs: 39pts, Gm 3 Vs. Atlanta HawksAllen Iverson vs Michael Jordan (Final NBA Game) Part 2
michael-jordan-2002-nba-record-51-pts-at-age-38.htmlmichael-jordan-2002-nba-record-51-pts-at-age-38.htmlmichael-jordan-2002-nba-record-51-pts-at-age-38.html
17 year old Kobe Bryant's 1st Pro Game as a LakerMichael Jordan 1993: 64 pts Vs. ShaqBest block ever by Michael Jordan
michael-jordan-2002-nba-record-51-pts-at-age-38.htmlmichael-jordan-2002-nba-record-51-pts-at-age-38.htmlmichael-jordan-2002-nba-record-51-pts-at-age-38.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
kobe was too young ... ( 1 week ago by esteng4)
kobe was too young on that time.and bulls was on its peak of their career with mj..but if the ability of kobe and shaq measures in present time.maybe bulls will lose in game.
but look at the the ... ( 1 week ago by dawnoflife3)
but look at the the great players of today.. kevin garnett, allen iverson, lebron james,dwight howard and some of the old plaeys...like moses malone...they are all great players who didn go... but then again...ther are who dont do so well..like kwame brown
or maybe they avoid ... ( 1 week ago by cam4hmrs)
or maybe they avoid him because he's 6'8 and 274 pounds.
whos 6,8? ( 6 days ago by 0utIaw)
whos 6,8?
"kobe was too young ... ( 4 days ago by blackadam06)
"kobe was too young on that time.and bulls was on its peak of their career with mj"
1996-98 WERE NOT MJ's "Peak" years. Those were the years he was on the DOWNSIDE of his career, but he "STILL" was heads
shoulders above the rest..
1986-92 were his "PRIME" yrs. That was "Air Jordan"..kobe comes NOWHERE CLOSE to that MJ. He more favoriably compares to the '96-'98 version of MJ, as far as physical ability goes..
"MJ is the GOAT ... ( 4 days ago by blackadam06)
"MJ is the GOAT when it comes to stats"
No, MJ is the GOAT of 2-guards because of what he "CONSISTENTLY DID" on the floor. The stats are a "RESULT" of that. The league doesn't just "Make Up" stats
assign them to people LOL!!
In EVERY facet of the game, MJ in reference to kobe, is simply just better. His CAREER #'s PROVE it.. Hell, in 2 yrs with the wizards, he went out
posted avg's that are virtually "IDENTICAL" to kobe's "Career" avg's
he was 40!
go fuck yourself up ... ( 3 days ago by stamberling)
go fuck yourself up bitch!
Before mj back to ... ( 3 days ago by neo8183899)
Before mj back to nba with the wizards his point per game average was 31 (with the bulls), that means the consistency he had in every game no one right now can beat this absoluty amazing....
Nope. MJ was in his ... ( 2 days ago by jimmychuang)
Nope. MJ was in his prime from 1987 to 1992. After 1993, MJ changed his style of play because he needed to save energy and focus on fade away shots. 1996 to 1998, MJ was not "AIR JORDAN" as used to, but he raised his fade away skill to an art level. But as a sports man, of course MJ was better offense and defense player when he was younger. Kobe never faced MJ in his prime, it's the fact.
He changed his ... ( 2 days ago by hassan09)
He changed his style as you said, but his ball skills became god-level around high 20's of age
"No, MJ is the GOAT ... ( 2 days ago by ojikeman24)
"No, MJ is the GOAT of 2-guards because of what he "CONSISTENTLY DID" on the floor. The stats are a "RESULT" of that."---Wow, it doesn't take a genius to know that. "In EVERY facet of the game, MJ in reference to kobe, is simply just better. His CAREER #'s PROVE it.."---I respectively disagree, one thing I've learned is stats NEVER measure up to the importance of a player's role on a team...NEVER (ex. Robert Horry)
"Hell, in 2 yrs ... ( 2 days ago by ojikeman24)
"Hell, in 2 yrs with the wizards, he went out
posted avg's that are virtually "IDENTICAL" to kobe's "Career" avg's
he was 40!"---Wow...you definitely don't understand do you? Kobe dropped 81 POINTS on one team...
people say "oh but it was Toronto"...that doesn't matter...NO ONE should drop 81 points in this age in time...NO ONE. Not to mention, he outscored (62 points) the whole team of Dallas in 3 QUARTERS!...oh yeah, did I mention that Dallas went to the finals that SAME YEAR!
I understand ... ( 1 day ago by blackadam06)
I understand perfectly..
What you're "FAILING" (
MISERABLY at that) to understand, is these kinda offensive explosions by him, are a DIRECT RESULT of the "Changes" in the defensive rules, more than his offensive talents.
Is it "Coincidence", that "Prior To" the defensive changes, he never came ANYWHERE CLOSE to avg'n 30ppg or that Shaq was the ONLY player with a 60+ pt offensive effort since the 90's? SINCE those changes, we have 6 players with 60+ pts in a game..ALL GUARDS!
"stats NEVER ... ( 1 day ago by blackadam06)
"stats NEVER measure up to the importance of a player's role on a team"
Of course they do! Did horry ever lead ANY of the teams he played on in ppg, rebounding, assists, steals, blocks, etc.? Then it's PLAIN to see, what his "Role" was.. Stats CONSISTENTLY reflect performance on the court, which "IS" influenced by skill/talent, thus they CONSISTENTLY reflect who tha
t player is, was
has been for their career..
1st U say that ... ( 1 day ago by blackadam06)
1st U say that stats "Don't" determine the "WORTH" of a players role on their team.
But you're arguing his 81 pt game
his outing vs Dallas as his "Worth" in reference to MJ.
U guys ALWAYS pick these "mini-accomplishments" of kobe's to try
compare to what MJ CONSISTENTLY did offensively.
This only highlights just "HOW" out of his league he really is when put into it's PROPER perspective. He's NEVER scored 50+ pts vs the league's #1 or 2 defense in his career! Think about that..
i respectively ... ( 1 day ago by ojikeman24)
i respectively disagree once again and still stick to my claim that "stats NEVER measure up to the importance of a player's role on a team"...you attempted to downsize Robert Horry's performance by showing "consistency" with stats but the mere fact of his game winning shots in CRITICAL junctures of PLAYOFF series that LITERALLY changes the COMPLETE DYNAMIC of a team's ability to win the series with all due respect....throws STATISTICS in the trashcan.
As far as defensive ... ( 1 day ago by ojikeman24)
As far as defensive techniques, i think a guy by the name of "kb42pah" (i think but i could be wrong)posted a video showing the defensive system of boston against kobe in the 08 finals. People began to post comments speaking about how Jordan was being "handchecked" the WHOLE time and kb just didn't compare. So "kobe42pah" redid the WHOLE video showing a MASS number of clips where Kobe was being handchecked and popped around like a punching bag.
That only " ... ( 1 day ago by blackadam06)
That only "HIGHLIGHTS" just how much he "Struggles" vs tough, physical
aggressive defense LOL!! Remember the '04 Finals? And NONE of these teams today are as physical as the Bad Boy Pistons, early 90's Knicks, hell, mid 90's Heat LOL!! Is it coincidence that for kobe's 1st 8 yrs, he played against that kinda defense
he avg'd only 21ppg on 42% shooting, but "After" the rules changed, it jumped to 31ppg on 46% shooting. U think that's a coincidence?
In 2004, just " ... ( 1 day ago by blackadam06)
In 2004, just "BEFORE" the implementation of the Anti-Hand checking
3-sec rule(s), the Top 10 scorers were avg'n 23.45ppg with 4 players 6-6
shorter
2 post players. In 2006, just 2 yrs "AFTER" the changes, the Top 10 scorers were avg'n 29.1ppg..a 23% INCREASE, with 6 players being 6-6
under, with NONE OF THEM being post players! I ask again, is it just a coincidence that all these wing players, especially kobe, started havin' these offensive explsions around the time of the changes?
You'd have a "Legit ... ( 1 day ago by blackadam06)
You'd have a "Legit" argument "IF" we were comparing Horry to other players from the perspective of how consistently "Clutch" he was.. Again, those stats you're trying to throw out, "WOULD INDEED" tell us who he is, based on the "frequency" he's made clutch shots vs someone else, if that were the basis of the comparison.. Like I said, Stats CONSISTENTLY reflect performance on the court, which "IS" influenced by skill/talent..
ojike, mini ... ( 1 day ago by Hawkhunter07)
ojike, mini accomplishments don't measure up to accomplishments that MJ did consistently over time, and Yes I consider 81 points and outscoring dallas mini accomplishments, because they are only a few games
Array ( 17 hours ago by blackadam06)
Exactly..
They ALWAYS tty to take a "FEW" moments of Jordan-esq offensive brilliance by kobe
compare it to what MJ "Consistently" did for his career
think that they're making a LEGITIMATE argument LOL!!
Like I said, once its put into its PROPER perspective, it only HIGHLIGHTS just how he DOESN'T compare to MJ..
Kobe wishes could ... ( 5 hours ago by RohoicRamz94)
Kobe wishes could play like Jordan in his prime but hes stuck at 98 Jordan.
88 Jordan would have dunked on the entire Laker team more than once in this game.
But returning back ... ( 3 hours ago by ojikeman24)
But returning back to the point, i watch basketball not to measure how a player measures up to another...or who may be the better player. I watch basketball to see something that i've never seen before. I've been in too many discussions where Mike and Kobe are continuously disrespected to the point where individuals begin to recede into name calling...at the end, both individuals are frustrated b/c they didn't necessarily persuade the other to "switching sides"...let's not go there. much respect


خلفيات وصور عالية الدقة,مكتبة ضخمة,2MrNa Photoslibrary for I


Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code