Creation Astronomy Propaganda Debunked 01

Search Tags:

Categories:

Creation Astronomy Propaganda Debunked 01

Uploaded by: AndromedasWake
Video Description:
The pilot episode of 'CrAP Debunked'. If you liked this video, please help to spread it. Various images/videos produced by ESA/NASA/ESO.
Errata:
1. The phrase "Infinite volume hypothesis" is incorrect here. I meant to say either "Infinite density hypothesis" or "Zero volume hypothesis" (each implies the other).
2. Typo. The proton is in fact around one TRILLION times smaller than a full stop, not one billion.
3. Typo. This should of course read "..YouTube account". Thanks to Agnostic1 for making me aware of that!
Please check out the giants of YouTube's pro science collective:
Thunderf00t - Creator of the 'Why do People Laugh at Creationists?' series and many other fine videos.
http://www.youtube.com/thunderf00t
Potholer54 - Creator of the 'Made Easy' series as well as the new 'Debunking Creationist Junk' series.
http://www.youtube.com/potholer54
http://www.youtube.com/potholer54debunks
AronRa - Creator of the 'Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism' series.
http://www.youtube.com/aronra
DonExodus2 - Creator of the 'How Evolution Works' series and many other excellent videos.
http://www.youtube.com/donexodus2
Absent from the video but certainly no less important is cdk007! http://www.youtube.com/cdk007
Thanks for all your comments and suggestions. For those asking, the music used in this video in order is:
Chicago - Groove Armada
What We Need More Of Is Science - MC Hawking

Tags for this video: Astronomy Atheism Christianity Cosmology Crap Creation Debunked Evolution God Islam Propaganda Reason Religion Science VenomFangX VFX

Find more videos in the "Tech" category
See more videos uploaded by AndromedasWake

Related Videos

Ben Stein & His Crap	Creation Astronomy Propaganda Debunked 04	Creation Astronomy Propaganda Debunked 06

The Big Bang is a Big Lie. The word of God is TRUTH.	Creationist Junk Debunked #1 - Introduction	The Problem With Creationism

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

I'll watch it, no ... ( 2 days ago by Stuartsaves)

I'll watch it, no problem. However, you should probably know that I don't weep when my beliefs are challenged, nor do I believe that any scientific theory can be toppled by a Youtube video.
Thanks for providing a link by the way, I can see you really take this seriously...

Ok, watched the ... ( 2 days ago by Stuartsaves)

Ok, watched the video. It's an interesting theory, I think Carl Sagan once proposed something like it (but don't quote me on that...)
I fail, however, to see what that has to do with anything, are you trying to prove a global scientific conspiracy exists, and therefore the universe isn't billions of years old? I must count this as a non-sequitur, I'm afraid

« It's an ... ( 2 days ago by XGralgrathor)

« It's an interesting theory »
We talking about the same video? The "Expanding Earth" conspiracy theory?

Well, this is the ... ( 1 day ago by Stuartsaves)

Well, this is the first I've heard of it. It is interesting in and of itself, I haven't actually done any fact checking as of yet, so it might prove false later. Right now though, yes, it's interesting

« I haven't ... ( 1 day ago by XGralgrathor)

« I haven't actually done any fact checking as of yet »
But I assume that you've had education in basic matters regarding geology and astronomy in high school - specifically regarding the way it is thought that star systems form, and the way our planet has developed. It would be very surprised if you did not know that the things you were told in highschool presented the view of the vast (99+ %) majority of the scientific community for a number of decades now, if not longer.

« I haven't ... ( 1 day ago by XGralgrathor)

« I haven't actually done any fact checking as of yet »
I'd also be surprised if you had never heard of such things as GPS, relativity theory, conservation of mass, etc... Certainly you're just humoring Entropy56?

Well, I've been ... ( 1 day ago by Stuartsaves)

Well, I've been looking over the facts regarding this expanding earth theory, and it does seem pretty far fetched, since it doesn't provide a mechanism to explain said expansion, and it also ignores things like the process of subduction and a lot of other verified findings.
And, be clear that I'm no scientist, yes I've heard of relativity theory, conservation of mass and such things, but how they relate to the earth expanding or not I couldn't tell you.
But it is, as I said, interesting.

And being ... ( 1 day ago by Stuartsaves)

And being interesting doesn't make it right, and I never said it did. Actually, if it had any real merit, I would think more of the scientific community would support it.

« but how they ... ( 1 day ago by XGralgrathor)

« but how they relate to the earth expanding or not I couldn't tell you. »
Ah, simple. If the Earth were expanding at anything near the rate claimed, we could measure it using GPS. If it were smaller in the past, then either it had less mass, or everything we know (and observe) about physics is wrong. Less mass would mean a radically different atmosphere. While it is at the basis of GPS, I named R.T. just for good measure ;) Certainly there are many other facts the E.A. violates.

" Less mass would ... ( 1 day ago by XGralgrathor)

" Less mass would mean a radically different atmosphere. "
(Aside from the fact that they'd have to explain where the new mass came from ;))

Ahh yes, the ... ( 1 day ago by Stuartsaves)

Ahh yes, the increase in mass is a good point.
Now I can say I learned something today. Well, actually several somethings by my count

Throw in the Global ... ( 1 day ago by Entropy56)

Throw in the Global Warming hoax and you have enough information to know how reliable science is at dealing with things far into the future and far into the past.

GW/CC is not a hoax ... ( 1 day ago by AndromedasWake)

GW/CC is not a hoax Entropy56.

"Throw in the ... ( 1 day ago by SexyMelon)

"Throw in the Global Warming hoax and you have enough information to know how reliable science is at dealing with things far into the future and far into the past."
What Global Warming hoax?

Sadly, you have not ... ( 1 day ago by kenfo0)

Sadly, you have not proved anything. This is not to say the other guy is correct. You throw some jargon (sorry, I'm educated and not easily confused) around acting as if it is truth. For example, at one pt you speak of gravity. using the same argument you use against creationists, go ahead and show me gravity. you can't. you can show me the effects of gravity, but you can not actually show me gravity. therefore, like God, you are simply believing based on interpretation of effects.

GW may or may not ... ( 1 day ago by kenfo0)

GW may or may not be a hoax. But MMGW most certainly is COMPLETELY unproven. It is the next "crisis" necessary for the involved parties to make a fortune and force a lifestyle upon you whilst they do as they please.

very nice,thanks ... ( 1 day ago by weRollin26s)

very nice,thanks for uplaoding it

It is embarassing ... ( 1 day ago by VioletCosmonaut)

It is embarassing to watch K.H.pontificate and insert his little jokes here and there in his "matter of fact" tone. At least I have the magnificent ownage to look forward to. ;)

Kenfo, Actually, ... ( 22 hours ago by CodeSculptor)

Kenfo, Actually, the theory of gravity posits a mechanism of operation, explains observations, and generates reproducable predictive outcomes. It is complete. The position on gravity is that it is an illusion caused by the curvature of space and time. To that end, we can show you that space and time are clearly being distorted in an empirically demonstrable way and precisely in accordance with the theory.

I like the fact ... ( 11 hours ago by kenfo0)

I like the fact that you mental weaklings neg my post but CAN NOT contradict what I wrote with any fact. MMGW is a joke, and it is on you.

Same here. Can not ... ( 11 hours ago by kenfo0)

Same here. Can not deny what I said with facts, simply whine "pfft" and neg post....weak.

Code: thanks for ... ( 11 hours ago by kenfo0)

Code: thanks for writing. I am aware of the theories regarding gravity. My point is that if a religious group changes it's mantra, it is immed. assailed as "aha! you were wrong!". In science, we call this progress. Scientific understanding of gravity has evolved over time, and it is not nearly complete, as your post would have one beleive. Some believe gravity is not a force at all, but an expression of the interaction of other fundamental forces (the pt of my post).

A very dangerous ( ... ( 11 hours ago by kenfo0)

A very dangerous (incorrect) analogy. For example, someone could have visited the victim just before the murder (dna, fingerprints) after his gun was taken to kill the victim (then put back). I spell this out for the terminally silly. How many have been wrongly convicted of a crime based on "evidence"....many. An eye-witness may even be worse proof.

I especially object ... ( 7 hours ago by burchdc)

I especially object when they try to claim that science is a belief system or even a religion. Science is about as far from religion as one could get. Scientists don't "believe" theories, they accept them based on evidence. Are there still questions science hasn't answered? Of course, and there always will be. Otherwise our need for science would be done. But just because we haven't answered some questions doesn't mean we haven't answered any.

Tell a friend:

2MrNa.cOm Videos

Run your own youtube sharing site

Creation Astronomy Propaganda Debunked 01

URL
Embed Code