The Truth According To Wikipedia



Uploaded by: VPROinternational
Video Description:
The Truth according to Wikipedia
More info on http://www.vpro.nl/programma/tegenlicht/afleveringen/39405191/ (Dutch)
Google or Wikipedia? Those of us who search online -- and who doesn't? -- are getting referred more and more to Wikipedia. For the past two years, this free online "encyclopedia of the people" has been topping the lists of the world's most popular websites. But do we really know what we're using? Backlight plunges into the story behind Wikipedia and explores the wonderful world of Web 2.0. Is it a revolution, or pure hype?
Director IJsbrand van Veelen goes looking for the truth behind Wikipedia. Only five people are employed by the company, and all its activities are financed by donations and subsidies. The online encyclopedia that everyone can contribute to and revise is now even bigger than the illustrious Encyclopedia Britannica.
Does this spell the end for traditional institutions of knowledge such as Britannica? And should we applaud this development as progress or mourn it as a loss? How reliable is Wikipedia? Do "the people" really hold the lease on wisdom? And since when do we believe that information should be free for all?
In this film, "Wikipedians," the folks who spend their days writing and editing articles, explain how the online encyclopedia works. In addition, the parties involved discuss Wikipedia's ethics and quality of content. It quickly becomes clear that there are camps of both believers and critics.
Wiki's Truth introduces us to the main players in the debate: Jimmy Wales (founder and head Wikipedian), Larry Sanger (co-founder of Wikipedia, now head of Wiki spin-off Citizendium), Andrew Keen (author of The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy), Phoebe Ayers (a Wikipedian in California), Ndesanjo Macha (Swahili Wikipedia, digital activist), Tim O'Reilly (CEO of O'Reilly Media, the "inventor" of Web 2.0), Charles Leadbeater (philosopher and author of We Think, about crowdsourcing), and Robert McHenry (former editor-in-chief of Encyclopedia Britannica). Opening is a video by Chris Pirillo.
The questions surrounding Wikipedia lead to a bigger discussion of Web 2.0, a phenomenon in which the user determines the content. Examples include YouTube, MySpace, Facebook, and Wikipedia. These sites would appear to provide new freedom and opportunities for undiscovered talent and unheard voices, but just where does the boundary lie between expert and amateur? Who will survive according to the laws of this new "digital Darwinism"? Are equality and truth really reconcilable ideals? And most importantly, has the Internet brought us wisdom and truth, or is it high time for a cultural counterrevolution?
Broadcast date: April 7, 2008
Direction: IJsbrand van Veelen
Interviews: IJsbrand van Veelen / Marijntje Denters / Martijn Kieft
Research: William de Bruijn / Marijntje Denters
Production: Judith van den Berg
Commissioning editors: Jos de Putter / Doke Romeijn




Tags for this video: 2.0 amateur cult encyclopedia expert internet keen knowledge leadbeater macha o'reilly sanger truth wales web wikipedia

Find more videos in the "Tech" category
See more videos uploaded by VPROinternational

Related Videos
Wikipedia: London BombingsRon Paul Courageously Speaks the TruthThe Israel Lobby (Marije Meerman, VPRO Backlight 2007)
wikipedia-london-bombings.htmlwikipedia-london-bombings.htmlwikipedia-london-bombings.html
Seattle Conference on Scalability: Scalable Wikipedia with EThe Truth about Wikipedia CreditYou Can't Handle The Truth
wikipedia-london-bombings.htmlwikipedia-london-bombings.htmlwikipedia-london-bombings.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
DO NOT DONATE TO ... ( 3 weeks ago by SweetMusic69)
DO NOT DONATE TO WIKIPEDIA! It abuses the ideals of the internet, which is the free exchange of information. A number of its editors enforce their own narrow agendas, and they are generally supported by fellow editors without question!
Wikipedia is good for checking out simple facts, but nothing more!
Encyclopedia ... ( 3 weeks ago by Pocketass666)
Encyclopedia Dramatica has better information anyway...
i did ( 1 week ago by theleftorium)
i did
The internet is not ... ( 6 days ago by theshlauf)
The internet is not a free exchange of information. Someone owns the servers, network providers charge for admission.
Only looking at the text and pictures are free... (unless its porn)
The fact that wikipedia is asking for money and not charging means they are more "ideal to the internet" as you put it than the internet itself.
these morons of ... ( 5 days ago by jurn77)
these morons of todays world actually donateed over 3 million dollars to a "non profit site:!! i like the wikipedia, but i wouldnt donate to it!
I agree SweetMusic! ... ( 4 days ago by Tonetare)
I agree SweetMusic! Wikipedia sux when it comes to trying to edit the site. A lot of the editors are passive/aggressive and get their friends to help them out. I was banned for some stupid shit several months back but I am back and no administrators are aware of it--dumbasses
some people arent ... ( 4 days ago by Tonetare)
some people arent smart. Who the hell would donate that much money to fucking wikipedia. I wouldn't donate so much as a quarter to wikipedia
Wknight is a fucked ... ( 4 days ago by crancrab1)
Wknight is a fucked up administrator over there. Really fucked up. He's unfair and abuses his power as an administrator. I haven't respected the site since
yh, i know!!! 3 ... ( 4 days ago by jurn77)
yh, i know!!! 3 million dollars to a site in which, is FREE!!! WTF!?
WTF ( 4 days ago by jurn77)
WTF
The problem is not ... ( 4 days ago by esteban0321)
The problem is not the content on wikipedia or any other media source. The problem is that most people are not capable of discerning and looking for multiple sources in order to form and educated opinion. That said the majority of wikipedea is supirior to the information found on major media outlets. The system may not be perfect but that is why wikipedia and other sources that at least attempt to tell the truth are necessary. And we should use our 'thinking caps' and figure out what we believe.
shut up estaban! ... ( 4 days ago by Tonetare)
shut up estaban! Wikipedia sux and if u donate your money, you're not using your thinking cap
lol! Jurn77, I ... ( 4 days ago by Tonetare)
lol! Jurn77, I don't understand it either. A lot of morons out there
I know Tonetare! ... ( 3 days ago by jurn77)
I know Tonetare! people blow all their cash, on what, i site that might not even have the right info! Here is another thing, nowadays u type in anything, as in family guy or GTA and add wiki at the end and there is a site based on that thing! the point is, everyone, dont donate money to the wikipedia or any of its sisters(wiktionary). oh, and there slogan "Wikipedia is there when you need it, now it needs you"! WTF. what nimrods would be pulled in by this load!?
-Jurn77
haha! Jurn77 ... ( 3 days ago by Tonetare)
haha! Jurn77 totally agreed! I swear, sometimes I think I could become a millionaire by throwing up a site on the internet with 'pay me' on the homepage while the rest of the pages are blank. What bothers me even more, is Wikipedia has so many shortcomings and hoards of complaints about those shortcomings yet are asking for money and getting it. This is despite the fact that if they fixed those shortcomings they still wouldn't deserve any money as the site claims to be free
Yah, totally agree! ... ( 3 days ago by jurn77)
Yah, totally agree!!! most of the articles on the wikipedia say "this article is a stub". or something like that. And yeah, if i could go in and be like jurnpedia needs yur donations lol. im sure i could get 3 million dollars right there to, like those scammers at wikiepdia.
LMAO! like the " ... ( 3 days ago by Tonetare)
LMAO! like the "jurnpedia", jurn77. haha! Oh btw, I just got an e-mail from a wikipedia donater Jurn77 asking if he could donate 5 million dollars in cash to jurnpedia. The moron can't even find it over the internet. lol
HA!!! HA!!! LOL, ... ( 2 days ago by jurn77)
HA!!! HA!!! LOL, LMAO, ROFL! hat is very funny!!!! yah and guess what, it seems like the wikipedia gets more cash by the second, they think there gonna gret to 6 million dollars!!! those people are stupid, toetare.
Haha! Thanx and you ... ( 2 days ago by Tonetare)
Haha! Thanx and you got that right. 6 million? Are you serious. That whole situation just pisses me off. Anyways, thanx for adding me as your friend. Always like to have intelligent friends here on youtube :)
48 min.? ( 2 days ago by DAL2543)
48 min.?
Yah, and oh, your ... ( 2 days ago by jurn77)
Yah, and oh, your welcome. me to, i like to have friends who actually no what the hell their talkin about. also yah i guess wikiepdia think were morons like them!! 6 MILLION!!! most peple are middle class around here, no more. and they expect us to send 6 mil, to a encyclopedia. YAH, ALRIGHT!! stpid morons!
lmfao jurn77 :) ( 2 days ago by Tonetare)
lmfao jurn77 :)
yeah, and another ... ( 1 day ago by jurn77)
yeah, and another thing on that topic, how in the ---- are wikipedia gonna use that money?
yah, lol wikiedians. ( 1 day ago by jurn77)
yah, lol wikiedians.


خلفيات وصور عالية الدقة,مكتبة ضخمة,2MrNa Photoslibrary for I


Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code